Sunday, April 24, 2011

Free Public Transit: Pros and Cons

There's free public transit in Downtown Long Beach, CA
Source: Long Beach Transit

It's come to my attention that some people want public transit to be free to the people who use it. Seems like an interesting idea to explore.

Pros
Free public transit (which I'll call FPT) would increase the number of people using transit, other things equal. FPT eliminates the wasted time on buses when the vehicle is stopped while people pay their fares. With FPT everybody could just get directly on the bus using every door. This saved time would make transit that much more attractive. More use of transit under an FPT system would mean fuller, more efficient buses and trains, from an environmental perspective. FPT would take the money saving mission of transit as far as it can go and give people a huge financial incentive to use it. This would be especially helpful to poor people, other things equal.

Cons
Transit fares are a significant source of revenue for transit agencies. The percentage of the cost of operating transit systems paid for by fares (the farebox recovery ratio) varies from system to system. For LA Metro it's about 29%. If we moved to FPT that money would be gone, and to maintain the level of service on the system or improve it that money would have to come from somewhere else. I doubt that the increased efficiency would completely make up for the lost revenue, otherwise why wouldn't transit agencies already be doing this as standard practice? The money would probably have to come from higher local taxes, but it might also come from fees on real estate developers called exactions, that are designed to mitigate the impacts of new projects. Therefore, the result of FPT would be either higher taxes, more fees of development, or reduced transit service. If society could not be convinced to come up with the money, the result would be longer waits for buses and trains and possibly more crowding on them. Another con would be reduced appeal of transit to conservatives. They're already unlikely to be fans of public subsidies for transit. More public subsidy will make them even more hostile. That creates a funding problem politically.

In Conclusion
In an ideal world FPT would be an excellent way to approach transportation in urban areas because we would be able to take advantage of its benefits and society would come up with the money to pay for it, thus avoiding its most serious drawbacks. In the real world, the economy is terrible and it's hard to convince people to raise taxes to pay for transportation. 

However, advocating for FPT isn't necessarily misguided. It focuses attention on our transportation spending priorities, points out the very real problem of wasted time as people pay fares, and dares to dream about a future where transportation is affordable to all and society is very committed to making transit successful.

FPT advocates should realize that what they want to achieve is very difficult, and has significant potential to backfire. But on the other hand, if we can't dream about a dramatically better world, what have things come to?

2 comments:

  1. One way in which FPT makes a lot of sense is in terms of human psychology. When driving, costs aren't immediate. Even gasoline, the most immediate cost of driving, isn't paid immediately. My relatively fuel-efficient vehicle can travel hundreds of miles before I need to think about the cost of my trip, whereas transit has an immediate, headline fare upon boarding.

    Human beings are really bad at making decisions based on long-term information, and are largely driven by short-term consideration. FPT would equalize this decision-making process. This is the same reason that I recommend that occasional riders purchase prepaid passes, or put money on a reloadable transit card where available.

    ReplyDelete
  2. San Francisco tried this a few years ago...and the real problem was that there were lots of rude, obnoxious and homeless freeloaders riding Muni. It was horrible. It was so bad, they never did it again.

    As somebody who takes public transit everyday, we cannot open up transit to be "free fare". It would be overrun by transients, and rude/inconsiderate people. Thos people who are already denied primarily by paying a fare.

    ReplyDelete